Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome/labral injury: effect and grading the quality of evidence
Between-group difference (95% CI) | Effect size | ||||
Large | Medium | Small | Trivial | ||
Prescribed physiotherapy vs operative treatment | |||||
Meta-analysis | |||||
iHOT-33 at 8–12 months follow-up; n=57420 | 11.02 points (4.83; 17.21) in favour of surgery, I2=43%, Hedges g=0.41 | Moderate quality of evidence | |||
Randomised controlled trial | |||||
iHOT-33 at 24 months follow-up; n=8070 | 6.3 points (−6.1; 18.7) in favour of surgery, Hedges g=0.23 | Low quality of evidence | |||
iHOT-33 at 12 months follow-up; n=9081 | 12.11 points (3.27; 20.96) in favour of surgery, Hedges g=0.61 | Moderate quality of evidence | |||
Prescribed physiotherapy vs passive modalities, stretching and/or advice | |||||
Meta-analysis | |||||
IHOT-33 and NAHS at 12 weeks follow-up; n=5414 | Hedges g=0.66 (0.09; 1.23) in favour of prescribed physiotherapy, I2=0% | Low quality of evidence | |||
Randomised controlled trial | |||||
HOOS-Sport at 6 weeks follow-up at; n=3573 | 9.4 points (0.1; 18.8) in favour of prescribed physiotherapy, Hedges g=0.46 | Very low quality of evidence | |||
Comparison between different physiotherapy interventions | |||||
Randomised controlled trial | |||||
iHOT-12 at 8 weeks follow-up; core and hip exercises vs hip exercises; n=2474 | 25.7 point (11.44; 39.96) in favour of core and hip exercises, Hedges g=1.14 | Very low quality of evidence | |||
HOOS-Sport at 12 weeks follow-up; standard training vs ’movement pattern’ training; n=4622 | 3.69 points (−4.36; 11.74) in favour of standard training, Hedges g=0.19 | Low quality of evidence | |||
HOOS-Sport at 52 weeks follow-up; standard training vs ‘movement pattern’ training; n=4680 | 9.70 points (−2.19; 21.59) in favour of ‘movement pattern’ training, Hedges g=0.53 | Very low quality of evidence | |||
HOS-Sport at 6 weeks follow-up; hip exercises at home vs manual therapy and supervised physiotherapy; n=1872 | 21.1 points (−9.1; 51.3) in favour of hip exercises, Hedges g=1.27 | Very low quality of evidence | |||
Preoperative physiotherapy vs massage therapy | |||||
Randomised controlled trial | |||||
NAHS at 12 weeks follow-up after surgery; n=1879 | No difference; raw values not reported | Very low quality of evidence | |||
Prescribed postoperative physiotherapy vs advice | |||||
Meta-analysis | |||||
iHOT-33 at 12–14 weeks follow-up; n=4714 | 14.37 points (2.98; 25.77) in favour of prescribed physiotherapy, I2=0%, Hedges g=0.67 | Low quality of evidence | |||
Randomised controlled trial | |||||
iHOT-33 at 24 weeks follow-up; n=2878 | 7.1 points (−5.5; 19.6) in favour of prescribed physiotherapy, Hedges g=0.38 | Low quality of evidence |
I2 (heterogeneity in study results); Hedges g assessed as trivial (g<0.2), small (g≥0.2), medium (g≥0.5) and large (g≥0.8).
HOOS, Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; HOS, Hip Outcome Score; IHOT, International Hip Outcome Tool; NAHS, Non-Arthritic Hip Score.